Evidence of meeting #14 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was budget.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Bernard Shapiro  Ethics Commissioner, Office of the Ethics Commissioner
Robert Benson  Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Ethics Commissioner
Lyne Robinson-Dalpé  Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

4:10 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Basically what happens is that the employment benefits plan is based on the actual salary you forecast. As well, it's also based on a percentage that's pre-established by Treasury Board. In previous years it was 20%. This year it went down to 19%, so it's an adjustment.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Okay, so there was an internal adjustment for that.

And I'm voting today on what you spent in this budget year, or what you're planning to spend up to the end of March. Is that correct?

4:10 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

That's correct. Okay.

You've highlighted the two things, the two memoranda of understanding. What I don't understand--and it's not really a budget question, in a sense--is whether you were paying another source for those services you're getting from the Library or from the House of Commons prior to your signing these memoranda of understanding.

4:10 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Last year we had some flexibility in our budgets. We didn't use up all the salary dollars we were allocated. Therefore, what we ended up doing instead of doing supplementary estimates to cover these agreements was use the flexibility we had within our budget.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Okay, that wasn't my question, though. Prior to these memoranda of understanding, were you paying somewhere else for these services that they actually provide?

4:10 p.m.

Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Robert Benson

If I may, that was in our initial year--our transition year--and a bit into the second. We were getting services from Industry Canada, where the old office was housed, for information technology and so on.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Okay, and was there an internal transfer of the costs for those, or did you have to actually pay for them?

4:10 p.m.

Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Robert Benson

We had to pay for those services.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

You paid for them. And is that included in the $4 million--whatever it was--the $4.6 million?

4:10 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Actually, for Industry Canada there was only a $60,000 payment last year, but most of the chunk was paid out of the 2004-2005 budget.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

So with regard to the additional 10% you've added this year for these two services you're getting--and Dr. Shapiro indicated that it has been good value--how were you able to do the work before you bought those services?

4:10 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

In the previous years, in 2004-2005, we were included within Industry Canada, because before its creation, the organization was within Industry Canada. We maintained those service levels. We did the work internally, but basically, Industry Canada was our contact with Public Works, for example, because on a monthly basis we have to submit trial balances and so on.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

You don't consider this additional 10% new services, then. These are just transferred to a different source.

4:10 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Have you started working on next year's budget for your program?

4:10 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Does that include Bill C-2 passing?

4:10 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

No. Once again, our 2007-2008 main estimates will be based on our operational requirements of the moment. If Bill C-2 passes, we will have to go for supplementary estimates at that point in time.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

But supplementaries--well, maybe because of the election I may be wrong--come in the fall, do they not?

4:10 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Exactly, but unfortunately, because the main estimates for 2007-2008 are due to Treasury Board in the middle of November and haven't passed, we cannot anticipate the costs.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Right. So you submit your budget requests, or estimates as we call them here, in November of this year for April 1 of next year. You submit those to the Treasury Board, and they then get filtered to the House, because the House pays you. Is that not how it works?

4:15 p.m.

Director, Corporate Affairs, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

It goes through Milliken, the Speaker of the House, and then to Treasury Board.

4:15 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Wouldn't it be wise to have in advance of supplementaries next fall at least an idea of what it will do to your budgets if that legislation happens to pass?

4:15 p.m.

Ethics Commissioner, Office of the Ethics Commissioner

Bernard Shapiro

The answer is yes.