Evidence of meeting #14 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was mulroney.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Luc Lavoie  As an Individual
François Martin  As an Individual
Erica Pereira  Committee Clerk, , House of Commons

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Brian Murphy Liberal Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe, NB

Mr. Lavoie, in November 1995, the question from the CBC was, “Does Mr. Mulroney have any connection at all to either of the Swiss accounts in question?” And the numbers are there, namely code-named Devon. The answer: “I categorically deny that he has anything to do or has had anything to do with those accounts.”

Question: “Did he ever receive money from those accounts through a second party?” Answer: “Absolutely not.”

Question: “And you know this to be true?” Answer: “I know this to be true.”

Question: “How do you know?” Answer: “He told me.”

That was in 1995. You didn't know...and in fact, your state of mind was that he had received no money from Karlheinz Schreiber in 1995.

4:30 p.m.

As an Individual

Luc Lavoie

That's not what I'm talking about. We're talking about bank accounts as they were identified in the letter of request sent to Switzerland on September 29, 1995.

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Brian Murphy Liberal Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe, NB

I know what you were talking about.

4:30 p.m.

As an Individual

Luc Lavoie

I'm certainly not--

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Order, please.

There's a point of order.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

There's an issue in terms of the agenda. I thought at 4:30 we were to start a new individual. What is happening?

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Thank you, Mr. Wallace.

If you heard my opening statement, I referred...and Mr. Tilson raised this and argued this at the last meeting. I didn't take the time then, but I'll repeat what I said at the beginning of the meeting to remind members that when we approved the witness list last week and decided that Mr. Schreiber was not coming last Thursday, we went through it, and I explained to the committee at that time that we would put one comprehensive witness together with a narrower witness.

So we knew there was likely going to be an imbalance in the amount of time, notwithstanding the thing, but to allow the chair the flexibility to make sure, and in fact--

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Oh, so you are assuming that this is the substantive witness and the next witness is not.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Thank you.

It's not a point of order, but I did want to answer your question.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

It is a point of order when it's the orders of the day. The witness is listed as starting at 4:30.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

No.

Thank you, Mr. Wallace.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

I think we should be following the agenda, Mr. Chair.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Mr. Wallace, the committee approved the manner in which we would conduct these meetings. In fact, we also agreed--and the transcript of the meeting will show--that the meeting would go on beyond the scheduled time of 5:30 if the committee needed the time to complete and bring a questioning session to the end. That was approved by the committee. I'm following the committee's instructions.

So thank you.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

What question are we on now?

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

We're now in the third round.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

How long do you expect to go?

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

We're just getting to the end now. If you'd like to speak to me after, so that I can refresh your minds about what we agreed to last week, which is in the minutes.... I'll ask the clerk to please get the minutes out so that the members can know.

Now, let's move on with our business. Thank you.

Mr. Murphy, carry on. You have two minutes.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

Brian Murphy Liberal Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe, NB

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'll speak very quickly.

Mr. Lavoie, you told the nation that he had not received money from accounts—the Devon accounts, or whatever—in 1995. As far as you knew, he had received no money from Karlheinz Schreiber.

How could you possibly know he didn't receive money through the Devon account, because you now know, years later, that he got money from Karlheinz Schreiber, who had some implication in those accounts? How could you be certain in 1995 that he didn't receive money from Devon?

The answer is, I suggest, that Mr. Mulroney didn't tell you that he got any money from Karlheinz Schreiber, and therefore you told the truth when you said that he did not get any money from Devon or otherwise, because he kept that from you.

What do you think? Do you think you should give an answer to that?

4:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Luc Lavoie

I heard a statement. It was a little convoluted, but I'd like to help you—

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

Brian Murphy Liberal Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe, NB

Do you agree with it?

4:35 p.m.

As an Individual

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

Brian Murphy Liberal Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe, NB

Do you agree with the statement?

4:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Luc Lavoie

No, I don't.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

Brian Murphy Liberal Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe, NB

Could you tell me what the name was of the corporation Mr. Mulroney set up with respect to consulting? That's another question you didn't quite answer from me.

4:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Luc Lavoie

The same question was asked by Mr. Mulcair.