It's interesting, your question, because our name in English is “review committee” and in French it's
Intelligence Oversight Committee.
It's not the same. It's been there for 31 years, and I know that the first day I was appointed, I said, “What is that? It's not surveillance. Surveillance is oversight?”
Just to mention this point, we try in our review to get as close as we can to the factual points that are raised. For example, if there is an issue that is in the public domain, we try to put a team in quickly to look into the matter, but we cannot, I would say for obvious reasons, oversee when there are operations. It would be against all the rules and even the capacity of CSIS.
At the same time, we understand that our report is a little bit delayed compared to when things happen. We should remember nevertheless that in our report we mention when we did it, when CSIS reacted, and what the reaction was to it, which is the best we can do.
Maybe the committee of parliamentarians will have a little bit of oversight. I don't know, but it's the best we can do.