I can respond, because I understood the question.
I have some experience with the concept of cabinet confidences. First, we talked about it in law school some time ago when I was a student. Second, I worked at the Privy Council Office where, for a year, I was in charge of the unit that dealt with issues relating to cabinet confidences.
When we tackled the “Trudeau II Report,” we came up against a certain number of witnesses—six or nine—who told us that they would send us all the documents we'd requested, except the ones that had to remain confidential due to the concept of cabinet confidences.
I was a bit surprised, because the Conflict of Interest Act seems to indicate that the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner should enjoy some confidence when it comes to confidential documents subject to cabinet protection. As I mentioned in the report, I therefore pursued the matter by writing to the Clerk of the Privy Council, Mr. Shugart, to obtain more than what the order allowed Ms. Wilson‑Raybould to divulge. However, my request was declined.
At that time, I had to determine whether I had enough information to move forward or not. I considered the possibility of challenging the clerk's decision before the federal court. However, throughout my 43‑year career in public service, I was always mindful when it came to the use of public funds. Therefore, I decided that it wasn't worth wasting three years and spending $2 million to determine whether I would obtain access to those documents or not. As a result, we moved forward without the documents.