I'll start with you, Professor Stark.
You've made the comment that ethics rules should protect the public trust. I think that's incredibly important. At a time when the public sees their trust in democratic institutions and elected officials at all-time lows, we need to find ways to bolster public confidence.
Would adding apparent or potential conflicts of interest to the act close a loophole that currently allows compliance? Do you think doing so would address the concern that when the public currently sees a conflict, they feel like there's no action being taken?
