That's right.
Evidence of meeting #55 for Finance in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #55 for Finance in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.
A recording is available from Parliament.
10:40 a.m.
Conservative
Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON
Based on your ruling earlier, how is that not expanding the costs?
10:40 a.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Brian Pallister
The scope of the bill is not expanding; the actual dollar amounts within the bill are within the realm of legitimate amendments, but expanding the scope of those dollar amounts is not.
10:40 a.m.
Conservative
Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON
I see, I've got you. All right. It's not the money; it's the—
10:40 a.m.
Liberal
Massimo Pacetti Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC
I just lost my concentration again, with Mr. Wallace interrupting me.
10:40 a.m.
Conservative
10:40 a.m.
Liberal
Massimo Pacetti Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC
No, if the government's intent is real and they want to make an impact, it's nice to say $65 a month, but $65 a month over a 10-month period is $650 times 15%, which I think is 25 cents and is not going to do anything for students. So all I'm trying to do here is actually to do something for the students who incur expenses to go to school. We heard from numerous groups during the pre-budget consultation that they need help. Any type of help is helpful. This is not the best type of help for them, because this is only going to come 12 months after they've incurred the actual expense, but at least it's a step in the right direction.
So $200 times 10 months is a $2,000 credit, and times 15% it is $300. That's nothing compared with what the students are actually incurring in purchasing books; sometimes they're incurring $1,500 to $2,000 per semester for books. So it's not a big deal. If we're going to actually do something, I think this is the right way to do it.
10:40 a.m.
NDP
Judy Wasylycia-Leis NDP Winnipeg North, MB
I thought this approach would fit right in with the Liberals' approach of band-aid, ad hoc measures to deal with a serious problem--that is, student access to a university education. The problem we have goes back many years. This is just one more band-aid, following zillions of band-aids by Liberals, so I don't know what their concern is.
Is the intention of this section on credit for the purchase of textbooks to get a certain portion of the cost of textbooks into the hands of students? Is it $65 that they end up with?
10:40 a.m.
Director, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
The intent of this measure is to provide added assistance to students. It's not intended to cover the full cost of education or the full cost of textbooks. It's intended to provide some assistance. As indicated, it is calculated as $65 per month, for those who qualify for the education tax credit.
There's an example in the budget documents of an individual spending eight months of the year at a Canadian university, claiming $3,200 in education amounts and $4,000 in tuition, for a tax savings of $1,116—and increasing the amount of that assistance by $80.60 as a result of this new textbook tax credit.
10:40 a.m.
NDP
10:40 a.m.
Director, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
It would increase it by a little over three times—
10:40 a.m.
Director, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
—from $65 up to $200.
It would also increase the tax expenditures, as indicated in the budget documents, by the same proportion. We're looking at some $135 million and $125 million per year in the budget documents. So you could look at thrice that.
10:40 a.m.
NDP
Judy Wasylycia-Leis NDP Winnipeg North, MB
Mr. Chairperson, I'll just say that since we're left with nothing to do but put band-aids on band-aids, I have to support it.
10:40 a.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Brian Pallister
Mr. McKay, then Mr. Del Mastro, then Mr. McCallum, and then Mr. Savage.
I urge committee members to further the debate.
10:40 a.m.
Liberal
John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON
To make it fairly clear, so that Madame Wasylycia-Leis is clear on the Liberal position, this is a collection of the dumbest band-aids I've ever seen, and this is one of the dumber ones.
I have a daughter in first year at McMaster University.
10:40 a.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
10:40 a.m.
Liberal
John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON
Exactly, that's why I declared it.
I want to follow the bouncing ball here and actually figure out what her tax credit might be this year. I'm talking $65, multiplied by the number of months referred to in proposed paragraph (a).
Because she started in September, I take it that she gets four months. Is that correct, $65 times four months?
10:45 a.m.
Director, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
She's just started this year?
10:45 a.m.
Director, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
There are only four months to qualify for this year.