Subject to the clearance from our lawyer, we do have documentary evidence that indicates that Canaccord brokers were sending e-mails and other written documentation to the customers indicating that this asset-backed commercial paper was triple-A rated, that it had better liquidity than GICs--after all, GICs could not be sold in the secondary market like this paper could--and to top it, there was a statement made that it had better preservation of capital than guaranteed investment certificates. The reason given was that guaranteed investment certificates were subject to the $100,000 limit for the Canada deposit insurance.
For those not familiar with that, that's when you put your money in a bank deposit or a savings account or a term deposit or a GIC. For every bank you have money in, $100,000 of it is insured.
So the Canaccord customers were told in writing. We don't necessarily know it all, but we have a document and other common testimony that indicates this is the basis upon which it was sold to them.