We have. I've attempted to put my best thoughts forward in the discussion paper we published earlier this month that tries to put all that uncertainty we face into a full context and where forward guidance fits in that menu of possibilities.
What we need to acknowledge is that there are not only benefits to forward guidance, but there are costs. Those costs are associated with markets that function in an asymmetric manner because you've provided specific information on one side of the distribution and not on the other. Forward guidance has its main effect when the market stacks its positions and takes bigger speculative positions on the side of forward guidance. That's why it has an extra effect on interest rates. It means that when you change that forward guidance even a little bit, you can have these massive adjustments in the marketplace that can be very distorting.
In our view, it was time to remove that so the market would no longer be addicted to that statement. Then we can use it with full effect when we believe we need it, and the benefits outweigh the costs.