I know what that means, but I’m trying to understand one thing.
When you said that, it seemed to be about offshore tax evasion, because you mentioned fighting offshore tax evasion in your speech. You then referred to 37 convictions, 50 years of prison time and $10 million in fines. However, if we go back to another figure you mentioned many times in the House, there have been 78 convictions with respect to offshore tax evasion.
However, thanks to the work of a good CBC journalist, Elizabeth Thompson, we realized that very few of those 78 cases had anything to do with offshore tax evasion. However, today, you still refer to the 37 cases as tax evasion convictions. And when I ask you the question, you don’t say, “offshore.”
Why do you use so many numbers that mislead Canadians? When I ask you about offshore tax evasion, you answer that there are 78 cases, but virtually none of those cases are related to offshore tax evasion.