Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I just want to back up a bit to make sure I understand the context here. What the Gladstone decision did, to my understanding, was refer it back to the lower courts, and the lower courts didn't deal with it. They put a stay on it. DFO decided to deal with this in a political way, in essence.
So really, this decision was made at the time by the government and DFO on how they were going to manage the spawn-on-kelp industry. Is that correct?