The answer is very clear. It is clearly written in the annex that the subsidy is to the extent that it is specific. If you have a program that is generally available for all the economy, for agriculture, for every industry, and it's also applied to fishing--for example, employment insurance is not specific, so it couldn't be challenged. So you could be optimistic in this regard.
There is an ambiguity there: what is specific exactly in the context of fisheries? For example, if you have a subsidy available to all the fishing sectors, the issue is to know it is enough not to be specific, to be available for the same thing. For example, we don't know if a subsidy is available for all the agriculture sector if it's so wide that it's not specific. If it's available to all the economy, no problem, but if it's available only to all the aspects of the fishing industry, there is an ambiguity here for sure. It's exactly the same as for the agriculture sector.