In terms of reducing energy prices, we would sincerely like to have a plan, but do not. You referred to fishing boats. We know that there are different ways of lowering consumption. We believe that people are more and more aware of the need to reduce their consumption, and documenting to a greater extent the steps that can be taken to lower energy expenses on a fishing boat is one of the components of the LDC's action plan for the industry.
In terms of community revenues, over the past few years, revenues from the fishery have been based on shellfish, which was not the case 10 or 15 years ago. There was a far wider breakdown of revenues between the different groundfish and shellfish—lobster and crab.
Here, like everywhere else, the mainstay of the fishery is shellfish. Therefore, any fluctuation in prices paid when the fish is landed or on the market has a direct impact on our community's revenues. So, looking at what has happened to the price of lobster and snow crab in recent years—and I am excluding 2008—prior to 2008, we saw that there was relative stability. Last year, however, that was not the case. This year, we still do not know what is going to happen. So, the community here is more sensitive to variations in the market price of shellfish than other areas or geographic regions of Quebec, because our entire economy is steeped in the sea and its resources.
With respect to energy reduction, some processing plants are currently looking at the possibility of adding equipment that could enhance their energy performance, by creating large enough economies of scale in the processing plants, according to what I have been told.
If you don't mind, since we are talking about operating costs, I would just like to digress for one moment. Earlier, Mr. Arseneau talked about sea ports. On the Islands, we had 20 or more sea ports in the 1970s. Over a period of 32 or 35 years, we have gone from 20 to 9 fishing ports. That is the absolute bare minimum for the Magdalen Islands community. These ports have to be funded by Fisheries and Oceans. So, in terms of what the Department can do, that is clearly an important issue.
And, if I can just say one more thing in passing about operating costs, it is this. Whether we are talking about the cost of fishing licences or of certain control mechanisms, these are extremely important programs, but they are programs that are very expensive. I am thinking, in particular, of the control program for other fisheries. That is not the case for lobster, but it is for crab, where there are offshore observer programs in place, and so on. Fisheries and Oceans has an obligation to look at the operating costs that it passes on to the industry to see what can be done, within the Department, to reduce those costs for fishermen, given current economic conditions.