But as a New Democrat, I must say I'm pleased with the fact that the three provinces working with the federal government are at least working cooperatively on a particular plan, even if it may not be enough; it may fall short. At least it shows an indication of a willingness to, one, understand the problem, and two, try to find solutions within the three--with the federal government as well. I thought that was pretty good.
My colleague, Mr. Blais, came up with a good point on ACOA, though. We understand that if the provincial government gives you, say, x dollars, it has to give Ocean Choice three times the amount because of a previous contractual agreement they made in regard to Polar Foods. But ACOA may be--this sounds nefarious--a backdoor way of getting at some assistance, and it's something to look at. I can't, obviously, make any assurances on behalf of the committee, but it is one thing to look at. I can assure you, I know Mr. Blais and I and others will speak to the ACOA minister to see what assistance may be provided, because your Icelandic bank thing is not working; they are in serious trouble.
I have a last question for you.
She indicated before--although she didn't say it, since she didn't want her remarks to be misinterpreted--that it almost felt as though there was a tension between the harvesters, the processors, and various levels of government. There's always that sort of competitive tension there anyway.
Is there good dialogue between companies such as yours and the harvesters on a weekly or monthly basis to iron out some of the concerns and problems that you mutually face?