Evidence of meeting #44 for Fisheries and Oceans in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was research.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Anita Perry  Vice-President, Government and Public Affairs, BP Canada Inc.
Michael Peacock  Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Limited
Louis Fortier  Professor, Department of Biology, Université Laval

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Rodger Cuzner Liberal Cape Breton—Canso, NS

It's a negotiated fee, though, with ArcticNet.

11:50 a.m.

Vice-President, Government and Public Affairs, BP Canada Inc.

Anita Perry

Negotiated as opposed to...?

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Rodger Cuzner Liberal Cape Breton—Canso, NS

As opposed to ArcticNet coming and saying they're going to be in the area for this period of time, and they're going to offer to anybody, for half a million dollars.... Is that what it is? Is it the block of work that's necessary, and then you negotiate the fee?

11:50 a.m.

Vice-President, Government and Public Affairs, BP Canada Inc.

Anita Perry

It's the block of work that's necessary. It's what we need.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Rodger Cuzner Liberal Cape Breton—Canso, NS

Could you give us an indication of what the range would be in terms of what you have spent in that area in the last number of years?

11:50 a.m.

Vice-President, Government and Public Affairs, BP Canada Inc.

Anita Perry

In regard to our last year's project, in 2010 it was a $9-million contract for research activities. And then there was an additional $5.5 million, which covers our staff time and those kinds of things. But the contract is $9 million.

11:50 a.m.

Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Limited

Michael Peacock

And then from Imperial Oil it was a similar figure. It was $11 million for 2009. And our in-staff costs were about $5.5 million also.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Lawrence MacAulay

Mr. Cuzner, you're out of time.

Mr. Blais.

11:50 a.m.

Bloc

Raynald Blais Bloc Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I thought there wasn't much more time, so I'm going to speak quickly as well.

First of all, I'm going to ask a brief question. Without the Amundsen, the costs to both your companies for the same scientific data would have been higher, would it not?

11:50 a.m.

Vice-President, Government and Public Affairs, BP Canada Inc.

Anita Perry

I don't know. I really don't know.

11:50 a.m.

Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Limited

Michael Peacock

In fact I agree with what Anita said, but I would say one other thing. Without the collaboration we wouldn't have got as much data as we have now.

11:50 a.m.

Bloc

Raynald Blais Bloc Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

How does it work with Fisheries and Oceans Canada? Does the department have to give you an authorization to do exploratory work? Furthermore, does it subsequently have to grant you some kind of authorization for exploitation work? With regard to exploratory work, do you have to get the approval of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans in one way or another? I suppose that's the case, but I want to know how that works.

11:55 a.m.

Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Limited

Michael Peacock

As soon as we picked up these licences, we were in discussions with the DFO. We have the CEAA. We have the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act requirements. And on top of that, we have the EIA requirement, the environmental impact assessment requirement, as part of any regulatory submission we're going to have to do to the NEB.

This is my understanding of the process. If we were to submit an EIA to the NEB as part of a hypothetical exploration well application, the NEB would then consult with the DFO on certain fisheries and oceans aspects of that environmental impact assessment.

11:55 a.m.

Bloc

Raynald Blais Bloc Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

I only have a few seconds left, but I would like to point out that this is the nub of the potential problem, if there is a problem. By reason of the fact that you need Fisheries and Oceans Canada's authorization and that the department may eventually lease its boat, since that falls under the same budget, there's a kind of proximity.

I would like to know your response on that subject.

11:55 a.m.

Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Limited

Michael Peacock

Again, Monsieur Blais, I would come back to the fact that our relationship was with ArcticNet. It was the collaboration with ArcticNet on this program.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Lawrence MacAulay

Thank you very much, Mr. Blais.

11:55 a.m.

Bloc

Raynald Blais Bloc Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

There's your saviour.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Lawrence MacAulay

Mr. Donnelly.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Fin Donnelly NDP New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC

I'd like to continue on with the idea of a hypothetical situation or scenario.

My colleague Mr. Kamp mentioned environmentally responsible drilling. If I were to fast-forward into the future and paint a picture of drilling for oil in the Arctic, and there was an oil spill, how would this data you're collecting help in terms of dealing with that oil spill?

11:55 a.m.

Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Limited

Michael Peacock

Much of the data is what we call metocean data. We need to understand the currents, which way the ocean is moving. It's about ice thickness. We need to understand the thickness of the ice. That marine data is very important for us.

We also need to understand the baseline levels in the Beaufort Sea. I wouldn't say we don't have any data on that, but we have limited data on baseline levels.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Fin Donnelly NDP New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC

Is it possible that any of the data you're collecting could draw you to the conclusion that the Arctic is not the place to drill for oil because the ecosystem, for instance, is too sensitive and it may not be able to recuperate from an oil spill?

11:55 a.m.

Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Limited

Michael Peacock

Mr. Donnelly, again, I'm going to defer trying to answer that question until we've got the results from the National Energy Board's Arctic drilling requirements review. I think that will shed a lot of light on those requirements.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Fin Donnelly NDP New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC

I appreciate that. Again, it was in the realm of the hypothetical, so I'd appreciate you keeping it in mind.

Does that mean there is not a possible scenario where the data would show there are some places on the planet that are okay to drill if we use environmentally responsible drilling methods and some places where data would show it is not an okay place?

Are you saying it's too soon to tell, for instance, for the Arctic, that it may not be an appropriate place to drill?

11:55 a.m.

Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Limited

Michael Peacock

Again, I'm sorry to be repetitive, but I think we have to wait until we've got the conclusions of the Arctic drilling requirement review that the National Energy Board is sponsoring.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Fin Donnelly NDP New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC

My final question is how long do you anticipate it taking before you can make that conclusion?