Thank you, Mr. Chair.
These meetings can turn into what may seem unfair to you people as witnesses.
Ms. Perry, you got your back up pretty obviously in questioning from Ms. Jordan and Mr. Doherty. When something doesn't sound right or doesn't smell right, as parliamentarians, it's our job to question it. There are so many things here and, with all due respect, we don't seem to be getting any answers as a committee as to why some of these foolish-looking and foolish-sounding rules are in place. That makes this very frustrating for us, but don't take it personally.
Mr. Waddell, to your comment about how you're not an engineer or a safety engineer, I'm not either, but I can tell you that logic would tell me that a 50-foot boat would be a lot safer than a 20-foot boat. You may want to add that to your answer in the future.
One thing I want to ask about here is the exemption process. Mr. Donnelly hit on it. It sounds as though there is one. For every case out there where somebody has to fish using two licences with two different boats or, in the case of one guy, having to fish from four different boats, I would hope that DFO, all of you, are working on something that will address that, so that an exemption can be in place for each one of these types of things. I know there has to be a process and fishermen maybe don't like it. As a farmer, I don't like some of the process, but it has to be there.