I think Ms. Bergeron just did a fantastic job of explaining how local decision-making can be very effective. I'm not familiar with the details of it, but what I do see as a citizen and member of a number of panels is that there are many players and many voices.
I think one of the beauties of COVID is that we've moved to these virtual meetings. I now see that more voices can come around the table in the future, but, ultimately, in regard to the decisions that have been made at the federal level in Ottawa, I'm not sure that they have a clearer picture of the details than, say, Newfoundland or the Northwest Territories, which are probably going to start raising Arctic char up there as a cultured species. Out in B.C., we're very distant. We have the Rocky Mountains, and, of course, Alberta is going to get all the fish shortly anyway because of global climate change and all those black glaciers melting.
Things will change, but they'll change at the local level. I worked at the local level with DFO. We sat down around a table, and we decided the maximum temperature the Fraser River can reach in the summer when sockeye salmon are moving up in numbers. We said 18°. We went out and tested it, and guess what? Different populations that inhabit the Fraser River have different upper temperature limits. If you're dealing with the ones that are the wimps, the couch potatoes, that go just up to the Harrison River system, put them above 17°, and they're in trouble. Put them at 21°—and it does reach 21° degrees—and they're toast. They're dead. They're dead, so you wouldn't want in-river fishery at that particular stock of fish, and that sort of detail I have worked out through swimming experiments in respirometers to test their cardiac performance.
I'm very passionate about the knowledge that I generate. I believe it's good, sound, solid science. That's part of the decision-making.
First nations have to have a voice.