I was going to propose some clarifying language too. I wonder if I could do that without formally proposing it.
Speaking to Mr. Hardie's subamendment, I think it suggests that what we're trying to get at here is that it's about the search and rescue capabilities—that's the original part—as well as response times and the ability of the Coast Guard to respond to the mariner in the official language of their choice. I think that's what we're trying to get at. I think what we're getting hung up on is this issue of studying the official languages capacity overall in either the act or the Coast Guard. As I understood Ms. Desbiens' original thing, it was really about the ability to respond in the language that the mariner wants to communicate in, unless I have that wrong.