Yes, this will be a key part of implementing the fisheries monitoring policy, but specifically on the technologies related to e-logs themselves, there are a couple of fisheries where mandatory use of e-logs is in place and others where.... Indeed, for all fisheries we would now, I believe, accept the use of e-logs, but it's not mandatory.
One of the obstacles is getting the necessary applications in place in order to collect that data. We had embarked exclusively on third-party provision for this. Because the results of that third-party provision of the apps is such that there are some fisheries that are not covered by available e-logs, we're assessing the path forward on that in order to ensure we can, indeed, implement e-logs across fisheries, because it's not a one-size-fits-all. There are various data requirements and other things depending on the fishery, so it's not just whether there's an e-log application; it's whether there's an e-log application appropriate to collect the data necessary for a given fishery.