The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15

Evidence of meeting #1 for Fisheries and Oceans in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was arnold.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Mel Arnold Conservative Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I believe there are a couple of amendments required for this. I'll try to make them as one.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Mr. Arnold, I'm afraid that this is just the notice of motion right now.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Mel Arnold Conservative Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies, BC

Are we not discussing the motion?

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

No. Right now, this is just the notice being given for the motions.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Mel Arnold Conservative Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies, BC

Okay.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Is there anybody else who might want to move a motion here?

Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE

Yes, Chair. Thank you. Have we concluded with the two?

Mr. Chair, like Mr. Arnold, I would like to move this motion. It is that:

The committee recognizes that (i) abandoned and derelict vessels are a scourge on our coastlines, (ii) Canadians on all coasts are looking for a solution to the issues caused by abandoned vessels, (iii) the committee had completed a study on derelict and abandoned vessels and was in the drafting stage on a report on derelict and abandoned vessels in Canada during the 44th Parliament; and

that the evidence and documentation received by the committee during the first session of the 44th Parliament on the subject be taken into consideration by the committee in the current session;

that the committee agree to bring forward the draft report and instructions to committee staff on derelict and abandoned vessels it had begun in the 44th Parliament so that the committee can complete the vital work on this matter;

that, pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee request the government to table a comprehensive response to its report.

Mr. Chair, this would allow the analysts to conclude the work that was begun in the last Parliament, based on the testimony and the evidence given, and to prepare a draft report that will be reviewed by the committee during the fall session.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Thank you very much, Mr. Morrissey.

I believe this is going to be circulated momentarily so that members of the committee have it as well.

Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE

Chair, it's circulated using the verbiage I articulated.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Thank you very much, Mr. Morrissey.

We're going to briefly suspend until members have that in their inboxes.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

We're going to resume. All members should have received the motion by email.

Because we're not in committee business, in order for this to pass, we would need unanimous consent. As Mr. Morrissey mentioned, this would just allow the analysts to produce a report over the course of the summer based on testimony that was received in the last Parliament. If it does pass, there would be an opportunity for members to provide any comment or direction over the course of the summer to the clerk as well.

Go ahead, Mr. Morrissey.

Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE

Obviously, Chair, everybody then would have input into the consideration of the report before it's adopted and returned to the House.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

That's correct.

Alexis Deschênes Bloc Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj, QC

Mr. Chair, I want to make sure I understand correctly: Is the idea to continue a study that has already been started, or is it just to draft a report based on the meetings that have already taken place?

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

The committee did the study last year. It has heard from all the witnesses and has completed its study, but the analysts haven't finished the report. This motion will enable the analysts to finish drafting the report. It's not about holding new meetings with witnesses.

Is there consent in the committee to adopt the motion?

(Motion agreed to)

Okay.

Next is Mr. Arnold.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mel Arnold Conservative Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I'd like to move another motion:

Given that the 45th Parliament has begun and Canadian fisheries are at a crucial moment, pursuant to Standing Order 108, I move that the committee invite the Minister of Fisheries to testify before the committee for no less than two hours, and her department officials for one hour, no later than September 26, 2025.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Thank you very much, Mr. Arnold.

I understand that you're giving notice for that particular motion. Once we come to the appropriate time, that's something we can look at in our next meeting.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mel Arnold Conservative Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies, BC

No. This is a motion. We're in committee business, so I can move a motion.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

No, Mr. Arnold. We're actually not in committee business at this time.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mel Arnold Conservative Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies, BC

Then I move that we move to committee business, Mr. Chair.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Okay. I think that's a dilatory motion.

Does the committee agree to go into committee business?

Go ahead, Mr. Morrissey.

Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE

Chair, again, we would request a suspension for a moment to consider Mr. Arnold's request.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

We'll briefly suspend.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

We're going to resume.

A motion has been moved to go into committee business, so I think we need to just have a show of hands. Do we have agreement to—

Go ahead, Mr. Cormier.

Serge Cormier Liberal Acadie—Bathurst, NB

Before that, if Mr. Arnold agrees, I think we can just accept it by unanimous consent instead of going into committee business. If he agrees to that, we can just approve this by unanimous consent. We're okay with that.