The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15

Evidence of meeting #1 for Fisheries and Oceans in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was arnold.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Alexis Deschênes Bloc Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj, QC

What is the unanimous consent for, exactly? Is it for that motion or to move into committee business?

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Unanimous consent is being sought in relation to Mr. Arnold's motion.

Alexis Deschênes Bloc Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj, QC

I propose going into committee business, as was moved, to debate my motion, for which the opposition is proposing amendments, as well as that of my colleague and those of the party in power. Either we decide to give notice of those motions or we talk about them later. We shouldn't set one aside to deal with another.

Serge Cormier Liberal Acadie—Bathurst, NB

Mr. Chair, I'd like to clarify something for Mr. Deschênes.

Our colleague Mr. Arnold moved a motion to invite the minister and the officials. Then, he proposed that we move into committee business so that we can approve the motion through a vote. What we are now proposing is to adopt the motion through unanimous consent, since we agree on the proposal.

Alexis Deschênes Bloc Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj, QC

What I understand is that my motion will simply be put on notice while the others will have already been debated. I'm worried about it getting to be a little too late in the process. If we're adopting substantive motions, let's do so for all the motions that have been proposed. If not, let's give notice of all the motions, and we'll come back to determine the order.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Thank you, Mr. Deschênes.

Mr. Cormier, you have the floor.

Serge Cormier Liberal Acadie—Bathurst, NB

Mr. Chair, I'd like to clarify something for Mr. Deschênes. Each member chooses to table a motion or simply give notice, so it was up to Mr. Deschênes to clarify whether he was giving notice of his motion or proposing it. Mr. Deschênes' intervention was considered a notice of motion, but Mr. Arnold proceeded differently. That may not be the case, but that's my understanding. Mr. Arnold's motion was different from Mr. Deschênes'. Mr. Deschênes gave notice of his motion, whereas Mr. Arnold moved his.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Just to clarify, the one that was passed unanimously was not a notice of motion. The other ones were notices of motion.

Alexis Deschênes Bloc Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj, QC

In that case, I don't give my consent to adopt this motion.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

With that, there's a motion to go into committee business. That was put forward by Mr. Arnold. Do we have agreement around the table to go into committee business?

Some hon. members

Agreed.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Okay. We'll go into committee business.

I have Mr. Morrissey and then Mr. Arnold.

Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE

Chair, am I correct that we are now in committee business?

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Yes, that's correct.

Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE

Then, Chair, I wish to move the following motion, which has been circulated. It's the return of the Fisheries Act to the committee.

I believe the clerk has the notice, Mr. Clerk, given that we're now in committee business.

Again, Clerk, this is a study that we began in the last Parliament. This would be moving for the committee to adopt the resumption of the study.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Mr. Morrissey, you've moved this motion. Members should have this in their email, and of course we have a hard copy that's being circulated. I don't know if you want to say anything else to it at this time.

Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE

No. It speaks for itself, Mr. Chair. If the committee adopts it, it's moving the study of Fisheries Act back to the committee for continuing consideration.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Thank you very much, Mr. Morrissey. With that, we can open it up for debate if any members would like to say anything to this motion.

Go ahead, Mr. Small.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Clifford Small Conservative Central Newfoundland, NL

Thank you, Chair.

I'm wondering what Mr. Morrissey's thoughts are on the witnesses. Will we be opening up new invitations to new witnesses or going back to the original witness list?

Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE

Mr. Chair, as usual, that would be entirely up to the direction of the committee. When it is considering this, the committee can go in any direction it chooses with a majority decision at any time. If it's the wish of the committee to add more witnesses, that would be considered.

It is the Fisheries Act, as I stated. We had significant witness appearances on it, but it would be up to the majority of the committee when the bill comes back from the House, Mr. Chair.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Thank you very much, Mr. Morrissey.

Is there anybody else who would like to weigh in on the debate?

Go ahead, Mr. Klassen.

Ernie Klassen Liberal South Surrey—White Rock, BC

This is just for clarification, since there are some new members here and we weren't part of hearing any of the witnesses speaking.

I'm not sure how that impacts how we would be voting, for example, as we do not have all of the history in front of us at this point. Could we get some clarification on that?

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Sure. I can mention that in the fall, we probably had four meetings on that. We had a number of meetings in the fall as a prestudy for the review of the Fisheries Act. A number of witnesses from across the country appeared as part of that.

We didn't finish that study. I forget how many meetings we still had to go. This would be a continuation of what was started in the fall, although because it's a new session after prorogation, we would have to start from the beginning.

Go ahead, Mr. Morrissey.

Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE

Chair, the committee could simply adopt by unanimity bringing forward the testimony and the witnesses who were already on the record. Am I correct?

I am, yes.

Then again, to go back to Mr. Small's question, as in any study, the committee can always choose to amend the witness list and extend it, or not, at the will of the committee majority at any time.

The Chair Liberal Patrick Weiler

Thank you, Mr. Morrissey.

Unless there's anybody else who would like to say anything about this, we can move to a vote.

(Motion agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

Go ahead, Mr. Arnold.