I guess I'd like to come back, then, to the figures I heard you mention with respect to budgetary increases. Of course, you will know that this rate of increase doesn't get us anywhere close to meeting 0.7%. One of the great ironies is that under the previous Conservative government, the level of ODA was already at 0.5%, and, regrettably, the Liberal government dragged it down to 0.23%.
The question is really whether the commitment is there on your part, and the government's—but in particular yours—to champion that commitment to reach 0.7%, which there's no question will require an escalation in the kind of international development assistance money that is made available.
The figures you cited would get us, at the maximum, to 0.43%, and that's only because of the NDP budgeted amount we were able to get at the eleventh hour in the last Parliament, which you've referred to in your figures. But with all of that, we would only be at 0.43%, which means we're a very long way from meeting our obligations and from the millennium development goals ever being achieved. By all experts' assessments, it depends on the donor nations reaching 0.7%.
So my question is still whether that's something to which you're committed, and whether we can count on you to fight for that, since there's such a strong consensus on it among the parties in this Parliament.