But she wasn't here. The problem was that information suddenly appeared that members were not cognizant of. They were operating in their own world. We need to have better liaison, whether that is by the chairman or a colleague. I have no difficulty if it's one of our colleagues on that subcommittee, but there needs to be some continuity and awareness of what is happening.
Sometimes they were dealing with, shall I say, fairly explosive issues, which we clearly were not cognizant of. I would be more than happy to suggest what some of them were. The subcommittee often deals with very touchy issues, such as--let's put it on the table--the comfort women issue. That was one good example. We had a subcommittee report on China and human rights. That would be another. Quite frankly, as a member of the standing committee, I was broadsided.
I really believe we should have a colleague—and not necessarily the chairman, because he has enough to do—on this committee. If members are agreeable, I am more than happy to nominate somebody. I think that would be appropriate.