As I understand it, we are being asked to vote on a proposal from Paul that the motion, which is at the end, should be brought up at the beginning. This is a two-step procedure, isn't it? We're not being asked today to vote on the substance of the motion; we're being asked to vote today on a procedural motion that says that because of what's happened....
I just want to be clear as to what we're actually debating. Am I right?