No, it's not for me to hear, it's for the members to hear.
I fully understand, and I fully expect the people in the steering committee.... That's what it's formed for, and that's why I hope they'll have it in confidence behind closed doors. I would certainly take their considerations, whatever they might be. However, if they decided among themselves that it was a sensitive issue, too sensitive to be brought forward or brought forward in this fashion, certainly that recommendation would be made and adhered to.
So because of the nature of it, because of the possible sensitivity of it and looking at the national security service and intelligence agency mentioned in this motion here, I would have concerns.
I repeat once again that my overall concern is that when we're jumping the queue in this fashion, without fully substantiating the importance and reason for jumping the queue, then I have concerns with it on several levels.