This will probably be the last question of this round. You said that the two-thirds rule was a new advantage created by the new convention. However, I remind you that the two-thirds rule can also be to our disadvantage because if the 50% rule is no longer applicable, it is gone for any consideration. In other words, if we want to impose conservation measures within the new NAFO, it will be just as difficult to impose such measures, because the two-thirds rule will apply in that case as well. The two-thirds rule could be to our benefit, but it goes both ways. The difficulty remains, be it for something good or something bad.
On October 6th, 2009. See this statement in context.