Absolutely, and we're there at the table to try to protect our interests. We haven't been very successful. As you know, my people at the table give advice to the delegation, and the delegation goes forward and makes all the decisions around the larger table. We have always stood behind custodial management, and as I pointed out to you, what happened when they went to the table was that they never went after custodial management; they went after NAFO reform. That's where we are today.
On the reforms, we try to make the best of them in looking at them. The vote is academic, I suppose—some will argue two-thirds and some 50%, But on sovereignty and a look at where we were, we cannot accept any intrusion on the 200-mile zone.