I mention that simply to enlighten those who say this is going too far, that we are setting up legislation that actually goes beyond the conditions we'd normally have with government's relationship with business. We do this kind of thing already.
My concern is that it's not being underlined that we're trying to move toward comprehension in terms of Canadian standards abroad. We have a Canadian brand, if you will--to use the language of business-- and we want to make sure it's preserved. SEMA is used from time to time, but in my opinion it's not comprehensive. And the rules of engagement are not comprehensive. They're ad hoc, if you will. As I said, I supported it when they were used because that's what we had.
Your point about this idea that somehow, if this is implemented.... A critique on this legislation has been that we're going to have litigation as a result and not compliance. But you point to the fact that there is already litigation out there.