This is a very interesting discussion. If I understand what the clerk is telling us, it is that if either Mr. Dewar's motion, which he is stating came out of the testimony of the people who represented the situation in Burma, or Ms. Lalonde's for Rights & Democracy had been raised specifically at that time, there still had to be unanimous consent of the committee to accept the motions. That's my first question. I'd like to continue my intervention, but I do need an answer to that question.
On November 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.