Okay.
There are two other areas in which I see contradictions or problems. The second one is this question of advocacy for women. One of the concerns I've had, and I've heard it from several NGOs, is the very real concern that in a number of countries, Canada is no longer funding advocacy groups for women--in Pakistan, for example, a very significant reduction in advocacy for women--in a number of situations where advocacy for women is critical.
We've heard about Match, we've heard about KAIROS and the other organizations; still no funding, I understand, for the International Planned Parenthood in the Canadian-based organization that is working overseas.
Can you explain why that would...if maternal health is significant? We all recognize that one of the reasons why we have not achieved the goals yet that we've set out--I would argue quite strongly--is that women are not empowered in enough societies to get the services they need and to insist on a different standard.
The record will show very clearly that one of the reasons industrialized countries have made such a dramatic change in the condition of women is because women have become politically empowered and socially empowered. That's why, in the past, Canadian governments have said we believe in equality for women and we believe that in empowering women and women's organizations and women's advocacy, we'll be able to improve their health.
So has that policy changed?