Thank you, Chair.
Thank you to our guest.
First, to clarify a point that was made by my colleague Mr. Goldring, I believe it wasn't General Leslie who decided not to go. The way the structure of governance goes, it would be the government that decides that--quite rightly--and not the general. We wouldn't want that system to be put into place. And we really haven't met the 20,000 complement for the peacekeeping forces in Congo.
That said, Dr. Deng, I was very interested in your comments around the three-pillared approach, and I welcome them. You didn't mention it, but it has been mentioned before that the case of Iraq set back the whole notion of R2P. Sadly, someone--a world leader who's no longer in power--used it as a premise for involving themselves in Iraq. I can see why some would be concerned about that. If that were the use of R2P--as a doctrine to intervene, in the case of Iraq--it would cause concern to me as well as to people who worked on that.
With regard to your point about emphasizing the other two pillars, I'll go back to the DRC. When you look at the regional actors, when you look at the capacity that is required, it would be interesting to hear from you on the areas where we, if we were willing to support...in the DRC, since you've been there and have written a report. And I'm referring to specific areas beyond the military. We'll put that aside, because that's a separate...we were asked to, and we provided an answer on that. But what other areas can we help out with in the DRC with regard to those other two pillars?