Well, I agree that there is a sense of uncomfortableness to have a report from another committee put before us: do you alter the work of the other committee or do you just stamp it going through? But I also think there's an importance here for the foreign affairs committee in regard to reviewing the report, because it could very well be impacting the work we may be doing on other issues.
So in a sense, I kind of agree, but on the other hand, I think it's important for us as a committee to be presented with it, and to have the opportunity to maybe pass comment on it if there's other work we're doing in conjunction with and at the same time as that report from the committee.