I think I need more explanation. Normally when we're doing clause-by-clause consideration, we do it in sequence for reasons that actually are related to Mr. Dechert's comments. Usually the bill is structured in a way that any amendment that you have in sequence would, by design, affect the bill, but if we jump to the end of the bill and bring forward an amendment, it disrupts that sequential arrangement that usually drafters consider.
It's up to you, Chair, but I think we should follow along those lines.
I'm not sure of the rationale here, Bob.