I'm actually not sure what Mr. Dechert is referring to in terms of the environmental overview here. We're actually talking about an issue of national security when we're talking about water. Absolutely, we're at the foreign affairs committee and there's a reason that this bill was brought to the foreign affairs committee. If it was solely environmental, I believe it would be before another committee. If that's the case, is Mr. Dechert suggesting that the government is not willing to have oversight and accountability on new legislation, as is often the practice in this place and certainly in the House of Commons when we're bringing in new legislation to see if it's working or not?
As to how this would affect other agreements and statutes, with respect, I don't think that's relevant. If the government wishes to, we can review any legislation. For Mr. Dechert to try and cover by way of circuitous rhetoric, I think is unfortunate. The government is really saying they're not willing to be accountable to review things on the environment front and that's unfortunate.