Chair, I think that's very important, in light of the argument that was attempted by the government. The way this is, if passed and proclaimed, it will start a new schedule separate from the argument that Mr. Dechert made. I'm simply saying that's great, let's do that, but let's have a five-year review, which is in keeping with the practice of new legislation. That's why I think a five-year review makes sense. I don't think it creates any inconsistencies and I think that's a cogent reason for supporting it.
On October 30th, 2012. See this statement in context.