Yes. I think I was commenting on the lay of the land regarding what exists now in terms of a legal framework. Contrary to some of the stories in the media and the suggestion that it's like the wild west, I think that's far from the truth.
That being said, in general there can be a demand for more specific agreements, depending on the area. This is something that does fall out of that framework on the UN Convention on the Law of Sea, which I mentioned, and its subsequent fish stocks agreement. That is the route through which fisheries are managed.
The Arctic Council, again, is a collaborative body for the Arctic states to have dialogue and to talk about sustainable development. It has increasingly tried to influence policy, but it is definitely not a management body. It doesn't have the legal mandate or the policy mandate or the expertise you would have. There is an established system that falls out of these UN instruments for fisheries management, so that would be the route a new fisheries management organization for the Arctic would take.