Yes, I try.
Article 21 on interoperability, we have it there. I understand why. What we're getting at though is the legislation and clause 11. I think you're opening up to amendments. I want to pause at the following. If in fact we've had the Ottawa protocol in the case of Afghanistan, in the case even of the general who will be in front of us soon, who was, I think, in Iraq. It proves the point that this has been tried and true, and so if we have that legislation, that works. I guess what we're trying to say is why not here?
Let me finish with this and I'll turn it over to my colleague. We're not talking about a situation that I believe you're putting on the table, wherein someone under the command of someone calls in an air strike, and if you're not saying air strike with clusters, you're okay. We've seen that with the landmines. I think that's an important piece. In other words—I know someone is nodding otherwise—the fact is that we have lived under that regime under the Ottawa treaty, and I believe you will find that our allies have done the same. They have put in safety measures so that interoperability is not going to be an impediment. They made it very clear that they are able to do this. I think we're just asking to have the same done. I think you're there. We just have to figure out what the language is.