They're different, Syria and Iraq. Let's begin with Iraq. I think if you have a committee, or if you charge a foundation or a university or whatever to invite and to develop a kind of dialogue, first separately, with people, you should avoid some mistakes that were done in 2006 and 2007, especially by the Nordics. I remember I was invited once by the Norwegian government, which was trying to help in Iraq for national reconciliation. When I went to Oslo I found that there were only members of the parliament, because at that time in the parliament everything was blocked. I said, well, those are not concerned by the national reconciliation; national reconciliation is those who accept the political process under occupation and those who are opposing, by arms, to have everybody.
In these things, especially with the complications now, we should have an objective. The objective is to isolate ISIS, if you have the other Sunnis. This is the difference with Syria. In Syria everybody is against, except if there's cynical work to use them or whatever, which is happening on the ground.
By inviting these groups, inviting members of the government and different parties, and then organizing a kind of seminar of national reconciliation, developing this and bringing some experts from Canada—because they need a lot of help, they don't know a lot of things—on institutions, federalism, changes in the constitution, I do strongly believe Canada can do a lot in this kind of dialogue.
Thank you.