Just briefly, I can't recall and maybe never read the resolution in 2003, but in trying to advance the premises of the convention, are we going to say that the combined persuasive powers of Canada, Britain, France, Germany, and Australia could not persuade the United States that they also should join this convention, because there are plenty of generals in the United States who would say that this is military nonsense, that it's a most indiscriminate weapon, a weapon that angers civilians. And, of course, if the United States said they were not going to use these weapons, then our problems would disappear immediately.
In regard to the importunities of the International Criminal Court, I think if you're worried about getting caught up in that, I'm not too sure that the International Criminal Court would regard clause 11 as giving an adequate defence in the face of very large numbers of civilian or child casualties.