I want to be in hot pursuit, as they say, of what happens sometimes in these events and round tables.
I want to build on what Mr. Wiebe was saying, because article 21.3 of the convention allows for military co-operation in operations with states not party to the convention.
In essence, there was a rationale for this in the treaty. It intended to allow military personnel, in our case Canadian personnel, to operate alongside personnel from countries, in our case the United States, who may use—albeit are “not likely” to, according to Prime Minister Fraser—cluster munitions and at the same time not allow Canadian personnel themselves to expressly order the use of those munitions. That's the essence of article 21.3, which is what you're saying, Mr. Wiebe, right? Does that capture it?