Thank you very much.
Mr. Lajeunesse, I want to follow up on an idea that we heard in testimony earlier, in the previous panel. You talked about how one of the motivations of the U.S. position with respect to the Northwest Passage is fear of setting a precedent. We heard earlier today that one way to circumvent that might be to have some kind of bilateral agreement with the United States that allows them, on a non-precedent setting basis, to recognize Canadian sovereignty over the Northwest Passage.
Do you think there would be interest there and enough advantage for the U.S. to have a trusted friend and partner manage the Northwest Passage? Might they be interested in that approach? Do you think that might be a good approach? Do you think it might be realistic to think that's an avenue worth exploring? Do you think there isn't really any potential there?