I was struck by the way you framed the beginning of your remarks, that sovereignty means different things to different people. There are the maritime boundaries and the legal discussion, but then you said it means something different to the people who live there.
One thing that was very clear from Inuit, indigenous and people on the ground on our tour was they consistently say, “Don't treat us like a park. We are not just a preserve for making you all feel good in the south. We want to be masters of our own domain.” Particularly, first nations have that right inherently. Does this park-like approach, Prime Minister Trudeau's ban on development and these sorts of things, hurt our claims to sovereignty?
A park obviously doesn't exhibit any presence of state. It doesn't allow us to have domain over our waters and our land, so does this approach of just preserves and Arctic parks hinder our ability to substantively advance our claims to the Arctic?