The other part of this piece that I want to get to before we run out of time is about climate change, which we mentioned earlier. It's real and it's an important issue. The Arctic is a sensitive environment. How important is it, then...?
When we talk about major infrastructure investment, a big part of the debate is about certainty, about environmental licensing processes, respecting indigenous rights and having indigenous peoples on board. Professor Lackenbauer was right. Some of the structures in place for recognizing indigenous rights as part of the process are stronger in the north than they are elsewhere in the country. How important is it that the long-term plan also discuss these issues—that is, how to do projects in ways that are environmentally responsible and how to determine which projects to say no to, if they violate certain principles or if they're not good enough?
How important is it to have those things as part of that long-term plan, if we get to have one?