That's correct. These are minor changes. The purpose of the changes in three places is to ensure that substitute decision-makers—guardians—do not unwittingly end up criminalized. It's just a small refinement to the wording.
More specifically, the first change would be to amend clause 2 by replacing line 3 on page 2 with the following:
person from whom it was removed or a person lawfully authorized to consent on behalf of the person from whom it was removed did not give in-
The second place where the same change occurs is in replacing line 8 on page 2 with the following:
knowing that the person from whom it was removed or a person lawfully authorized to consent on behalf of the person from whom it was removed
The third change replaces lines 12 to 15 on page 2 with the following:
does anything in connection with the removal of an organ from the body of another person on behalf of, at the direction of or in association with the person who removes the organ, knowing that the person from whom it was removed or a person lawfully authorized to consent on behalf of the person from whom it was removed did not give informed consent