I can tackle that one. I would say all of our humanitarian assistance is delivered first and foremost based on need. It's about the very real needs we see in different situations across the world. The need is always greater than any one country could possibly respond to. We prioritize based on a series of metrics about access to food, water, shelter, sexual and gender-based violence; and on a whole range of concerns that arise in emergencies, whether they are short-term emergencies caused by natural disasters, or whether, as is most common right now, long-running emergencies and slow-onset emergencies that develop over time and are caused by conflicts that can last decades.
We no longer prioritize based necessarily on the urgency of the moment, because we find that we're giving year after year. For situations in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, where we know that the needs are long term, we have to invest in a sustainable and long-term approach. We now are able to offer multi-year assistance in these countries, which really has made a difference to the efficiency and effectiveness because we can plan over the longer term. We can hire qualified staff over the longer term. The investments allow us to invest in the people of those regions so they can take control of their own development and advancement.