Yes. As you know, I'm sure, the ombudsperson at the UN for a long time was a Canadian judge, Kim Prost, who did an exceedingly fantastic job. I think there are two important things I would focus on. I'm less concerned with the particular institutions than with the functions they serve. To me, the important thing is that designated individuals have a meaningful opportunity to contest the sanctions that have been imposed on them and that the process is perceived as fair.
Different systems will have different ways of accommodating those two objectives. Given where the U.S. is, for example, I don't know that an ombudsperson would add a tremendous amount to the system that we currently have in place. I believe the system now allows for two different kinds of review. You can petition OFAC directly to reconsider a designation or you can file suit in court to have a designation reviewed by the judiciary. In that context, my sense is that this is an effective series of mechanisms to review a sanctions determination.
For example, speaking for the U.S., I don't know that an ombudsperson would add a tremendous amount to the already existing context. It may be the case in the Canadian context that an ombudsperson would add some measure of due process protections for designated individuals.