I would say that one problem the U.K. has had with the transfer of parts and components to the United States to be incorporated into weapons systems for onward transfer is that we then lose control of what is done with those arms or armed systems once they're transferred to that third country. Had the transfer been direct from the U.K. to the third country, there are many occasions when we would have put conditions on the transfer of parts, components, or arms that the U.S. does not necessarily impose. There is some loss of control.
As long as that kind of thing is allowed, and as long as there is a Canadian process, then.... I'm not an expert in the existing Canadian process, but as long as there is a process that is compatible with the ATT, that would be allowed.