Mr. Pardy, first of all, thank you very much for being here.
I want to follow up on the issue of crown prerogative, which you also highlight in the paper that you referred to.
In your conclusion in that report, you disavow the idea of crown prerogative. Usually, as you know, the government uses crown prerogative to give itself some flexibility in certain types of cases. If you were going to replace the concept of the crown prerogative, let's say maybe in legislation, how would you draft it? As you know, no two cases are the same, so how would you give the government flexibility to be able to deal with certain cases? What kind of framework would you see?