The way it works with diversion is that on the export permit, a consignee is listed alongside an end-user. These can sometimes be the same entity, for instance, the Turkish military or the Turkish air force. In the case of the permits you're referring to, the consignee was Baykar and the end-user was Turkey or some stripe of the Turkish security forces. In those instances, because the Wescam sensors, as per the final report's reading, were incorporated into a drone and therefore changed the nature of the weapon system, the end-use stopped with Baykar at that point. However, there were other permits in which the consignee and the end-user were the same entity, which was the Turkish security force, whether that be the police, the army, the navy, the air force or that sort of thing.
On April 27th, 2021. See this statement in context.