This is a really good question and one of the biggest challenges with regards to how we and others engage in Sudan. The context there is one of the most difficult ones we're facing. This is perhaps why it's difficult to articulate solutions.
What we see here are two belligerents using food as a weapon of war. The room to navigate here is pretty limited. That doesn't mean there aren't things we can do or things we can support the UN in doing. There is significant advocacy undertaken by Canada and like-minded states in the UN calling on the two belligerents to adhere to human rights law and international humanitarian law. As we've seen, there have been negotiations, including putting pressure on the two sides to ensure humanitarian access and to do things like open the border with Chad, which is a staging ground for the humanitarian response.
As we have discussed, funding is a huge part of this. Certainly, Canada, in terms of our announcement of $100 million in funding this year to the humanitarian response, is providing a portion of that response.
Then, of course, on our side, we are ensuring that response is as inclusive as it possibly can be in terms of reaching the poorest and most vulnerable, and we are calling out the belligerents for the actions they are undertaking and the degree to which they're using food as a weapon of war and restricting access to humanitarian assistance for their own interests and military gain.