If you are reading from your talking points, you could table them with the committee and we'll have a look at them.
Early in the conflict—this is more for Ambassador Angell—Ukraine was asking NATO to impose a no-fly zone. For the record, I agree with the decision not to. What puzzles me more is why NATO would make that position public.
Strategically, wouldn't it have been better to keep someone like Mr. Putin in the blind, wondering whether we might or might not take such an action?